jrpie-notes/probability-theory
Archived
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

some small changes

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Josia Pietsch 2023-07-10 23:56:21 +02:00
parent 81f911a05f
commit e6d50be72e
Signed by untrusted user who does not match committer: jrpie
GPG key ID: E70B571D66986A2D
2 changed files with 18 additions and 12 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
inputs/lecture_07.tex
View file

@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ More formally:
For every fixed $n$, $Y_n$ and $Z_n$ are independent. For every fixed $n$, $Y_n$ and $Z_n$ are independent.
\end{claim} \end{claim}
\begin{subproof} \begin{subproof}
This is obvious, but well prove it carefully here. This is obvious, but we will prove it carefully here.
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl} \begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
&&(\bP \otimes \bP) [Y_n \in (a,b) , Z_n \in (a',b') ]\\ &&(\bP \otimes \bP) [Y_n \in (a,b) , Z_n \in (a',b') ]\\
&=& (\bP\otimes\bP) \left( (\omega, \omega') : X_n(\omega) \in (a,b) \land X_n(\omega') \in (a',b') \right)\\ &=& (\bP\otimes\bP) \left( (\omega, \omega') : X_n(\omega) \in (a,b) \land X_n(\omega') \in (a',b') \right)\\

28
inputs/lecture_09.tex
View file

@ -50,32 +50,38 @@ So far we have dealt with the average behaviour,
\[ \[
\frac{\overbrace{X_1 + \ldots + X_n}^{\text{i.i.d.}}}{n} \to \bE(X_1). \frac{\overbrace{X_1 + \ldots + X_n}^{\text{i.i.d.}}}{n} \to \bE(X_1).
\] \]
We now want to understand \vocab{fluctuations} from the average behaviour, We now want to understand fluctuations from the average behaviour,
i.e.\[ i.e.\[
X_1 + \ldots + X_n - n \cdot \bE(X_1). X_1 + \ldots + X_n - n \cdot \bE(X_1).
\] \]
% TODO improve % TODO improve
The question is, what happens on other timescales than $n$? The question is, what happens on other timescales than $n$?
An example is An example is
\[ \begin{equation}
\frac{X_1 + \ldots + X_n - n \bE(X_1)}{\sqrt{n} } \xrightarrow{n \to \infty} hv \cN(0, \Var(X_i)) (\ast) \frac{X_1 + \ldots + X_n - n \bE(X_1)}{\sqrt{n} }
\] \xrightarrow{n \to \infty} \cN(0, \Var(X_i))
Why is $\sqrt{n}$ the right order? (Handwavey argument) \label{eqn:lec09ast}
\end{equation}
Why is $\sqrt{n}$ the right order?
Handwavey argument:
Suppose $X_1, X_2,\ldots$ are i.i.d. $\cN(0,1)$. Suppose $X_1, X_2,\ldots$ are i.i.d.~with $X_1 \sim \cN(0,1)$.
The mean of the l.h.s.~is $0$ and for the variance we get The mean of the l.h.s.~is $0$ and for the variance we get
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl} \begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
\Var(\frac{X_1 + \ldots + X_n - n \bE(X_1)}{\sqrt{n} }) &=& \Var\left( \frac{X_1+ \ldots + X_n}{\sqrt{n} } \right)\\ \Var(\frac{X_1 + \ldots + X_n - n \bE(X_1)}{\sqrt{n} })
&=& \frac{1}{n} \left( \Var(X_1) + \ldots + \Var(X_n) \right) = 1 &=& \Var\left( \frac{X_1+ \ldots + X_n}{\sqrt{n} } \right)\\
&=& \frac{1}{n} \left( \Var(X_1) + \ldots + \Var(X_n) \right) = 1
\end{IEEEeqnarray*} \end{IEEEeqnarray*}
For the r.h.s.~we get a mean of $0$ and a variance of $1$. For the r.h.s.~we get a mean of $0$ and a variance of $1$.
So, to determine what $(\ast)$ could mean, it is necessary that $\sqrt{n}$ So, to determine what \eqref{eqn:lec09ast} could mean, it is necessary that $\sqrt{n}$
is the right scaling. is the right scaling.
To define $(\ast)$ we need another notion of convergence. To make \eqref{eqn:lec09ast} precise,
we need another notion of convergence.
This will be the weakest notion of convergence, hence it is called This will be the weakest notion of convergence, hence it is called
\vocab{weak convergence}. \vocab{weak convergence}.
This notion of convergence will be defined in terms of characteristic functions of Fourier transforms. This notion of convergence will be defined in terms of
characteristic functions of Fourier transforms.
\subsection{Characteristic Functions and Fourier Transform} \subsection{Characteristic Functions and Fourier Transform}