195 lines
7.5 KiB
TeX
195 lines
7.5 KiB
TeX
\lecture{6}{}{Proof of SLLN}
|
|
\begin{refproof}{lln}
|
|
We want to deduce the SLLN (\autoref{lln}) from \autoref{thm2}.
|
|
W.l.o.g.~let us assume that $\bE[X_i] = 0$
|
|
(otherwise define $X'_i \coloneqq X_i - \bE[X_i]$).
|
|
We will show that $\frac{S_n}{n} \xrightarrow{a.s.} 0$.
|
|
Define $Y_i \coloneqq \frac{X_i}{i}$.
|
|
Then the $Y_i$ are independent and we have $\bE[Y_i] = 0$
|
|
and $\Var(Y_i) = \frac{\sigma^2}{i^2}$.
|
|
Thus $\sum_{i=1}^\infty \Var(Y_i) < \infty$.
|
|
From \autoref{thm2} we obtain that $\sum_{i=1}^\infty Y_i$ converges a.s.
|
|
\begin{claim}
|
|
Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence in $\R$
|
|
such that $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{a_n}{n}$ converges,
|
|
then $\frac{a_1 + \ldots + a_n}{n} \to 0$.
|
|
\end{claim}
|
|
\begin{subproof}
|
|
Let $S_m \coloneqq \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{a_n}{n}$.
|
|
By assumption, there exists $S \in \R$
|
|
such that $S_m \xrightarrow{m \to \infty} S$.
|
|
Note that $j \cdot (S_{j} - S_{j-1}) = a_j$.
|
|
Define $S_0 \coloneqq 0$.
|
|
Then
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
a_1 + \ldots + a_n &=&
|
|
(S_1 - S_0) + 2(S_2 - S_1) + \ldots + n(S_n - S_{n-1})\\
|
|
&=& n S_n - (S_1 + S_2 + \ldots + S_{n-1}).
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
Thus
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
\frac{a_1 + \ldots + a_n}{n}
|
|
&=& S_n - \frac{S_1 + \ldots + S_{n-1}}{n}\\
|
|
&=& \underbrace{S_n}_{\to S}
|
|
- \underbrace{\left( \frac{n-1}{n} \right)}_{\mathclap{\to 1}}
|
|
\cdot \underbrace{\frac{S_1 + \ldots + S_{n-1}}{n-1}}_{\to S}\\
|
|
&\to & 0,
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
where we have used
|
|
\begin{fact}
|
|
\[
|
|
\lim_{n \to \infty} S_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} S_i
|
|
\].
|
|
\end{fact}
|
|
\end{subproof}
|
|
The SLLN follows from the claim.
|
|
\end{refproof}
|
|
|
|
In order to prove \autoref{thm2}, we need the following:
|
|
\begin{theorem}[Kolmogorov's inequality]
|
|
\label{thm:kolmogorovineq}
|
|
If $X_1,\ldots, X_n$ are independent with $\bE[X_i] = 0$
|
|
and $\Var(X_i) = \sigma_i^2$, then
|
|
\[
|
|
\bP\left[\max_{1 \le i \le n} \left| \sum_{j=1}^{i} X_j \right| > \epsilon \right]
|
|
\le \frac{1}{\epsilon^2} \sum_{i=1}^m \sigma_i^2.
|
|
\]
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
Let
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
A_1 &\coloneqq& \{\omega : |X_1(\omega)| > \epsilon\},\\
|
|
A_2 &\coloneqq & \{\omega: |X_1(\omega)| \le \epsilon,
|
|
|X_1(\omega) + X_2(\omega)| > \epsilon \},\\
|
|
\ldots\\
|
|
A_i &\coloneqq& \{\omega: |X_1(\omega)| \le \epsilon,
|
|
|X_1(\omega) + X_2(\omega)| \le \epsilon, \ldots,
|
|
|X_1(\omega) + \ldots + X_{i-1}(\omega)| \le \epsilon,
|
|
|X_1(\omega) + \ldots + X_i(\omega)| > \epsilon\}.
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
It is clear, that the $A_i$ are disjoint.
|
|
We are interested in $\bigcup_{1 \le i \le n} A_i$.
|
|
|
|
We have
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
&&\int_{A_i} (\underbrace{X_1 + \ldots + X_i}_C
|
|
+ \underbrace{X_{i+1} + \ldots + X_n}_D)^2 d \bP\\
|
|
&=& \int_{A_i} C^2 d\bP
|
|
+ \underbrace{\int_{A_i} D^2 d \bP}_{\ge 0}
|
|
+ 2 \int_{A_i} CD d\bP\\
|
|
&\ge& \int_{A_i} \underbrace{C^2}_{\ge \epsilon^2} d \bP
|
|
+ 2 \int \underbrace{\One_{A_i} (X_1 + \ldots + X_i)}_E \underbrace{(X_{i+1} + \ldots + X_n)}_D d \bP\\
|
|
&\ge& \int_{A_i} \epsilon^2 d\bP,
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
since by the independence of $E$ and $D$,
|
|
and $\bE(X_{i+1}) = \ldots = \bE(X_n) = 0$ we have $\int D E d\bP = 0$.
|
|
|
|
Hence
|
|
\[
|
|
\bP(A_i)
|
|
\le \frac{1}{\epsilon^2} \int_{A_i} (X_1 + \ldots + X_n)^2 \dif \bP.
|
|
\]
|
|
Since the $A_i$ are disjoint, we obtain
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
\bP\left( \bigcup_{i \in \N} A_i \right)
|
|
&\le & \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}
|
|
\int_{\bigcup_{i \in \N} A_i} (X_1 + \ldots + X_n)^2 \dif \bP\\
|
|
&\le & \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}
|
|
\int_{\Omega} (X_1 + \ldots + X_n)^2 \dif \bP\\
|
|
&\overset{\text{independence}}{=}&
|
|
\frac{1}{\epsilon^2}(\bE[X_1^2] + \ldots + \bE[X_n^2])\\
|
|
&\overset{\bE[X_i] = 0}{=}& \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}
|
|
\left( \Var(X_1) + \ldots + \Var(X_n)\right).
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
\begin{refproof}{thm2}
|
|
Let $S_n \coloneqq x_1 + \ldots + x_n$.
|
|
We'll show that $\{S_n(\omega)\}_{n \in \N}$
|
|
is a Cauchy sequence
|
|
for almost every $\omega$.
|
|
|
|
Let
|
|
\[
|
|
a_m(\omega) \coloneqq \sup_{k \in \N}
|
|
\{ | S_{ m+k}(\omega) - S_m(\omega)|\}
|
|
\]
|
|
and
|
|
\[
|
|
a(\omega) \coloneqq \inf_{m \in \N} a_m(\omega).
|
|
\]
|
|
Then $\{S_n(\omega)\}_{n \in \R}$
|
|
is a Cauchy sequence iff $a(\omega) = 0$.
|
|
|
|
We want to show that $\bP[a(\omega) > 0] = 0$.
|
|
For this, it suffices to show that $\bP(a(\omega) > \epsilon] = 0$
|
|
for all $\epsilon > 0$.
|
|
For a fixed $\epsilon > 0$, we obtain:
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
\bP[a_m > \epsilon]
|
|
&=& \bP[ \sup_{k \in \N} | S_{m+k} - S_m| > \epsilon]\\
|
|
&=& \lim_{l \to \infty} \bP[%
|
|
\underbrace{\sup_{k \le l} |S_{m+k} - S_m| > \epsilon}_{%
|
|
\text{\reflectbox{$\coloneqq$}} B_l \uparrow%
|
|
B \coloneqq \{\sup_{k \in \N} |S_{m+k} - S_m| > \epsilon\}}%
|
|
]
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
|
|
Now,
|
|
\begin{IEEEeqnarray*}{rCl}
|
|
&&\max \{|S_{m+1} - S_m|, |S_{m+2} - S_m|, \ldots, |S_{m+l} - S_m|\}\\
|
|
&=& \max \{|X_{m+1}|, |X_{m+1} + X_{m+2}|, \ldots, |X_{m+1} + X_{m+2} + \ldots + X_{m+l}|\}\\
|
|
&\overset{\text{\autoref{thm:kolmogorovineq}}}{\le}&
|
|
\frac{1}{\epsilon^2} \sum_{i=m}^{l} \Var(X_i)\\
|
|
&\le & \frac{1}{\epsilon^2} \sum_{i=m}^\infty \Var(X_i)
|
|
\xrightarrow{m \to \infty} 0,
|
|
\end{IEEEeqnarray*}
|
|
since by our assumption, $\sum_{n \in \N} \Var(X_i) < \infty$.
|
|
|
|
Hence
|
|
\[
|
|
\bP[a_m > \epsilon] \xrightarrow{m \to \infty} 0.
|
|
\]
|
|
It follows that $\bP[a > \epsilon] = 0$,
|
|
as claimed.
|
|
\end{refproof}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Application: Renewal Theorem}
|
|
|
|
\begin{theorem}[Renewal theorem]
|
|
Let $X_1,X_2,\ldots$ i.i.d.~random variables with $X_i \ge 0$, $\bE[X_i] = m > 0$. The $X_i$ model waiting times.
|
|
Let $S_n \coloneqq \sum_{i=1}^n X_i$.
|
|
For all $t > 0$ let \[
|
|
N_t \coloneqq \sup \{n : S_n \le t\}.
|
|
\]
|
|
Then $\frac{N_t}{t} \xrightarrow{a.s.} \frac{1}{m}$ as $t \to \infty$.
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
|
|
The $X_i$ can be thought of as waiting times.
|
|
$S_i$ models how long you have to wait for $i$ events to occur.
|
|
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
By SLLN, $\frac{S_n}{n} \xrightarrow{a.s.} m$ as $n \to \infty$.
|
|
Note that $N_t \uparrow \infty$ a.s.~as $t \to \infty (\ast\ast)$, since
|
|
$\{N_t \ge n\} = \{X_1 + \ldots+ X_n \le t\}$ thus $N_t \uparrow \infty$ as $t \uparrow \infty$.
|
|
|
|
\begin{claim}
|
|
$\bP[\frac{S_n}{n} \xrightarrow{n \to \infty} m , N_t \xrightarrow{t \to \infty} \infty] = 1$.
|
|
\end{claim}
|
|
\begin{subproof}
|
|
Let $A \coloneqq \{\omega: \frac{S_n(\omega)}{n} \xrightarrow{n \to \infty} m\}$ and $B \coloneqq \{\omega : N_t(\omega \xrightarrow{t \to \infty} \infty\}$.
|
|
By the SLLN, we have $\bP(A^C) = 0$ and $\ast\ast \implies \bP(B^C) = 0$.
|
|
\end{subproof}
|
|
|
|
Equivalently, $\bP\left[ \frac{S_{N_t}}{N_t} \xrightarrow{t \to \infty} m, \frac{S_{N_t + 1}}{N_t + 1} \xrightarrow{t \to \infty} m \right] = 1$.
|
|
|
|
By definition, we have $S_{N_t} \le t \le S_{N_t + t}$.
|
|
Then $\frac{S_{N_t}}{N_t} \le \frac{t}{N_t} \le S_{N_t + 1}{N_t} \le \frac{S_{N_t + 1}}{N_t + 1} \cdot \frac{N_t + 1}{N_t}$.
|
|
Hence $\frac{t}{N_t} \to m$.
|
|
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|