fixed typo in orthogonal projection lemma
This commit is contained in:
parent
95d0184a95
commit
5e9da4cef1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ and then do the harder proof.
|
||||||
i.e.~$H$ is a vector space with an inner product $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_H$ which defines a norm by $\|x\|_H^2 = \langle x, x\rangle_H$
|
i.e.~$H$ is a vector space with an inner product $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_H$ which defines a norm by $\|x\|_H^2 = \langle x, x\rangle_H$
|
||||||
making $H$ a complete metric space.
|
making $H$ a complete metric space.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For any $x \in H$ and $K \subseteq H$ closed and convex,
|
For any $x \in H$ and closed, convex subspace $K \subseteq H$,
|
||||||
there exists a unique $z \in K$ such that the following equivalent conditions hold:
|
there exists a unique $z \in K$ such that the following equivalent conditions hold:
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
|
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
|
||||||
\item $\forall y \in K : \langle x-z, y\rangle_H = 0$,
|
\item $\forall y \in K : \langle x-z, y\rangle_H = 0$,
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue